Be Afraid
Just when I think nothing will surprise me, Afghanistan throws me a curve ball. Let me set the stage. Maj Apple, Wali, Hamid (our interpreters), and I were sitting in our office having a Deep Discussion about life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Somehow the topic of gays serving in the military came up, and Maj Apple and I both think they will be able openly serve in the military very soon. (I mention this to set the stage, not to start a debate. Personally, it wouldn’t bother me. If they want to come over and fight for their country, it’s fine with me. Welcome.) Once this topic came up, Wali asked why people were allowed to be openly gay in our country. We explained that in a free society, people are allowed to do pretty much what they pleased, as long as they were not hurting others, etc.
“But it is so revolting. A man would shame himself to do this.”
“Wali,” I asked, “What would happen to a man in Afghanistan if he openly declared he was gay?”
“That would never happen,” replied Wali, acting as though that was as likely as the Pope converting to Islam.
“I know. But let’s just pretend. For instance, let’s say a famous TV personality decided he wanted to try to change things here, so he announced on TV that he was gay.”
Wali interrupted. “But that would never happen.”
“Maybe it would. Just tell me what you think would happen.”
“His family would kill him immediately,” he said without batting an eye. Remember, Wali represents moderate, westernized, Islam in Afghanistan.
“Why would you kill someone just for being gay?” I pressed.
“Because my religion says so.” Again, as matter-of-fact as though he was explaining why a rock falls to the ground if you pick it up and then let go.
“Let’s suppose he escaped from his family. What would the government do? Would they arrest him?”
“Yes.”
“And would they then kill him?”
“Yes. This is an Islamic Republic. Our religion says to.”
“And if someone wanted to leave Islam and join another religion, they would be executed for that too, right?”
“Yes.”
The sad thing is, we could have been talking about football scores or the weather. He was not remotely embarrassed or hesitant in any of this. Hamid, however, was very quiet the whole time. I wonder what was going through his head.
“Well, if you believe all this, why would you want to move to America? We allow people to switch religions if they wish, or believe in nothing at all.”
“Do you have people from different religions marry each other?” he asked.
“Yes, all the time,” replied Maj Apple.
“What do they teach the children?”
“Usually they teach them both religions, and let them decide for themselves,” said Maj Apple.
Wali seemed a bit surprised by this. Steam was starting to come out his ears.
“America is not like Afghanistan,” I continued. “Our government does not tell us what to believe. We are free to believe whatever we wish. That is our greatness. We can say whatever we wish, as long as we aren’t threatening to kill someone or violently overthrow the government. We can get on TV and say we think the government is awful, and no one will arrest us.”
Maj Apple gave a brief explanation of how our country was founded by people who wished to worship in their own way. Once this was done, I asked again, “Do you think you could be happy in America? Muslims can leave the faith there, and no one will kill them.”
“That’s OK, as long as I can worship my way, I don’t mind what others do.”
So there you have it, the incongruity of a man who thinks it is perfectly normal to execute gays and apostates in this country, but doesn’t think it’s a big deal if he’s living in the US. No matter what your views on homosexuality, I doubt any of my readers wants to execute gays (well, maybe some Taliban trying to gather intel). Same thing with people who leave your particular faith. Would you kill them? (hopefully that’s a rhetorical question). Yet I live with seemingly normal, pleasant, hard-working people who would think nothing of doing this. This is not an isolated incident either. Other Americans have heard the same thing from their interpreters.
Now take this mindset, set temperature to high, and nuke for ten minutes, and you have some idea of the hatred and violence in the hearts of the men we are fighting against. Do you think diplomacy is going to work? Do you think you can reason with them? Be afraid. Be very afraid.











April 11th, 2007 at 1:43 pm
“Personally, it wouldn’t bother me. If they want to come over and fight for their country, it’s fine with me. Welcome.”
Sorry, you’ve got an argument on your hands whether you want one or not. This nonsense gets old real fast, especially from fellow soldiers. I’m assuming then that you believe that the latrines and showers should be co-ed as well? Because if not, then you’re either full of it or you’re a pogue or high ranking other who has his own room so doesn’t care how the rest of us have to live together.
There’s a very good reason while sexuality issues between relatives is still so taboo, despite the ever so “enlightened” times we now live in. Besides the genetic factor, it destroys the family unit and the trust that it requires. The same is true in an infantry platoon. Allowing open homosexuals into a platoon of grunts would cause as much social chaos within that family unit as would introducing a female into that environment. Forget combat effectiveness, all your training time will be on managing sexual harassment and other various HR issues that are a total waste of time for a unit that should be practicing urban tactics and marksmanship instead.
So called gays know exactly the parameters under which they can currently serve, and knew this from the moment they signed on the dotted line. No one in the DoD is gunning for them just to cleanse the ranks. The ones who do get kicked out do so because they’re looking for an easy way out of their commitment. I fail to see how retaining these type of people improves the quality of our armed forces, any more than condoning or overlooking adultery would. Until you can prove that homosexuality is an immutable condition like race rather than a “lifestyle choice” or even an abhorrent affliction like attraction to minors, then unit cohesion should take precedence.
At the very least, save your social engineering for peacetime where the potential consequences of such liberal feel-goodedness aren’t quite so high.
Buck Sargent
OEF 2003-04
OIF 2005-06
January 20th, 2008 at 2:51 am
volkswagen diler moskva volkswagen tehnicheskie harakteristiki koncern volkswagen mikroavtobusy volkswagen volkswagen passat tehnicheskaya harakteristika volkswagen passat tehnicheskaya harakteristika oficialnym dilerom volkswagen oficialnym dilerom volkswagen volkswagen otzyvy vladelcev